|
By
Zakir Naik
Below Are the most common
questions asked by non-muslims answered in sequence.
Q1.
Why is a man allowed to have
more than one wife in Islam? i.e. why is polygamy allowed in Islam?
Q2.
If a man is allowed to have
more than one wife, then why does Islam prohibit a woman from having more than
one husband?
Q3.
Why does Islam degrade women
by keeping them behind the veil?
Q4.
How can Islam be called the
religion of peace when it was spread by the sword?
Q5.
Why are most of the Muslims
fundamentalists and terrorists?
Q6.
Killing an animal is a
ruthless act. Why then do Muslims consume non-vegetarian food?
Q7.
Science tell us that whatever
one eats, it has an effect on one’s behaviour. Why then, does Islam allow
Muslims to eat non-vegetarian food, since eating of animals could make a person
violent and ferocious?
Q8.
When Islam is against idol
worship why do the Muslims worship, and bow down to the Kaaba in their
prayer?
Q9.
Why is the eating of pork forbidden in Islam?
Q10.
Why is the consumption of
alcohol prohibited in Islam?
Q11.
How can you prove the
existence of hereafter, i.e. life after death?
Q12
All religions basically teach
followers to do good deeds. Why should a person only follow Islam? Can he not
follow any of the religions?
Most
Common Questions asked by Non-Muslims
POLYGAMY
Question:
Why is a man allowed to have
more than one wife in Islam? i.e. why is polygamy allowed in Islam?
Answer:
Definition of Polygamy
1. Polygamy
means a system of marriage whereby one person has more than one spouse. Polygamy
can be of two types. One is polygyny where a man marries more than one woman,
and the other is polyandry, where a woman marries more than one man. In Islam,
limited polygyny is permitted; whereas polyandry is completely prohibited.
Now coming to the original question, why is a man allowed to have more than one
wife?
2. The Qur’an is the only religious scripture in the world that says,"marry
only one".
The Qur’an is the only
religious book, on the face of this earth, that contains the phrase ‘marry only
one’. There is no other religious book that instructs men to have only one wife.
In none of the other religious scriptures, whether it be the Vedas, the Ramayan,
the Mahabharat, the Geeta, the Talmud or the Bible does one find a restriction
on the number of wives. According to these scriptures one can marry as many as
one wishes. It was only later, that the Hindu priests and the Christian Church
restricted the number of wives to one.
Many Hindu religious
personalities, according to their scriptures, had multiple wives. King Dashrat,
the father of Rama, had more than one wife. Krishna
had several wives.
In earlier times, Christian
men were permitted as many wives as they wished, since the Bible puts no
restriction on the number of wives. It was only a few centuries ago that the
Church restricted the number of wives to one.
Polygyny is permitted in
Judaism. According to Talmudic law, Abraham had three wives, and Solomon had
hundreds of wives. The practice of polygyny continued till Rabbi Gershom ben
Yehudah (95% C.E to 1030 C.E) issued an edict against it. The Jewish Sephardic
communities living in Muslim countries continued the practice till as late as
1950, until an Act of the Chief Rabbinate of Israel extended the ban on marrying
more than one wife.
3. Hindus are more polygynous than Muslims
The report of the ‘Committee
of The Status of Woman in Islam’, published in 1975 mentions on page numbers 66
and 67 that the percentage of polygamous marriages between the years 1951 and
1961 was 5.06% among the Hindus and only 4.31% among the Muslims. According to
Indian law only Muslim men are permitted to have more than one wife. It is
illegal for any non-Muslim in India
to have more than one wife. Despite it being illegal, Hindus have more multiple
wives as compared to Muslims. Earlier, there was no restriction even on Hindu
men with respect to the number of wives allowed. It was only in 1954, when the
Hindu Marriage Act was passed that it became illegal for a Hindu to have more
than one wife. At present it is the Indian Law that restricts a Hindu man from
having more than one wife and not the Hindu scriptures.
Let us now analyse why Islam
allows a man to have more than one wife.
4. Qur’an permits limited polygyny
As I mentioned earlier,
Qur’an is the only religious book on the face of the earth that says ‘marry only
one’. The context of this phrase is the following verse from Surah Nisa of the
Glorious Qur’an:
"Marry women of your choice,
two, or three, or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly
(with them), then only one." [Al-Qur’an 4:3]
Before the Qur’an was
revealed, there was no upper limit for polygyny and many men had scores of
wives, some even hundreds. Islam put an upper limit of four wives. Islam gives a
man permission to marry two, three or four women, only on the condition that he
deals justly with them.
In the same chapter i.e.
Surah Nisa verse 129 says:
"Ye are never able to be
fair and just as between women...." [Al-Qur’an 4:129]
Therefore polygyny is not a
rule but an exception. Many people are under the misconception that it is
compulsory for a Muslim man to have more than one wife.
Broadly, Islam has five
categories of Do’s and Don’ts:
i.
‘Fard’
i.e. compulsory or obligatory
ii.
‘Mustahab’
i.e. recommended or encouraged
iii.
'Mubah’
i.e. permissible or allowed
iv.
‘Makruh’
i.e. not recommended or discouraged
v.
‘Haraam’
i.e. prohibited or forbidden
Polygyny falls in the middle
category of things that are permissible. It cannot be said that a Muslim who has
two, three or four wives is a better Muslim as compared to a Muslim who has only
one wife.
5. Average life span of females is more than that of males
By nature males and females
are born in approximately the same ratio. A female child has more immunity than
a male child. A female child can fight the germs and diseases better than the
male child. For this reason, during the pediatric age itself there are more
deaths among males as compared to the females.
During wars, there are more
men killed as compared to women. More men die due to accidents and diseases than
women. The average life span of females is more than that of males, and at any
given time one finds more widows in the world than widowers.
6. India
has more male population than female due to female foeticide and infanticide
India is one of the few
countries, along with the other neighbouring countries, in which the female
population is less than the male population. The reason lies in the high rate of
female infanticide in India,
and the fact that more than one million female fetuses are aborted every year in
this country, after they are identified as females. If this evil practice is
stopped, then India too will have more females as compared to males.
7. World female population is more than male population
In the USA, women outnumber
men by 7.8 million.
New York alone has
one million more females as compared to the number of males, and of the male
population of New
York one-third are gays i.e sodomites. The U.S.A as a whole has more than
twenty-five million gays. This means that these people do not wish to marry
women. Great Britain has four million more females as compared to males. Germany
has five million more females as compared to males. Russia has nine million more
females than males. God alone knows how many million more females there are in
the whole world as compared to males.
8. Restricting each and every man to have only one wife is not practical
Even if every man got
married to one woman, there would still be more than thirty million females in
U.S.A who would not be able to get husbands (considering that America has twenty
five million gays). There would be more than four million females in Great
Britain, 5 million females in Germany and nine million females in Russia alone
who would not be able to find a husband.
Suppose my sister happens to
be one of the unmarried women living in USA, or suppose your sister happens to
be one of the unmarried women in USA. The only two options remaining for her are
that she either marries a man who already has a wife or becomes public property.
There is no other option. All those who are modest will opt for the first.
In Western society, it is
common for a man to have mistresses and/or multiple extra-marital affairs, in
which case, the woman leads a disgraceful, unprotected life. The same society,
however, cannot accept a man having more than one wife, in which women retain
their honourable, dignified position in society and lead a protected life.
Thus the only two options
before a woman who cannot find a husband is to marry a married man or to become
public property. Islam prefers giving women the honourable position by
permitting the first option and disallowing the second.
There are several other
reasons, why Islam has permitted limited polygyny, but it is mainly to protect
the modesty of women.
POLYANDRY
Question:
If a man is allowed to have
more than one wife, then why does Islam prohibit a woman from having more than
one husband?
Answer:
A lot of people, including
some Muslims, question the logic of allowing Muslim men to have more than one
spouse while denying the same ‘right’ to women.
Let me first state
emphatically, that the foundation of an Islamic society is justice and equity.
Allah has created men and women as equal, but with different capabilities and
different responsibilities. Men and women are different, physiologically and
psychologically. Their roles and responsibilities are different. Men and women
are equal in Islam, but not identical.
Surah Nisa’ Chapter 4 verses
22 to 24 gives the list of women with who you can not marry and it is further
mentions in Surah Nisa’ Chapter 4 verse 24 "Also (prohibited are) women already
married"
The following points
enumerate the reasons why polyandry is prohibited in Islam:
1. If a man has more than one wife, the parents of the children born of such
marriages can easily be identified. The father as well as the mother can easily
be identified. In case of a woman marrying more than one husband, only the
mother of the children born of such marriages will be identified and not the
father. Islam gives tremendous importance to the identification of both parents,
mother and father. Psychologists tell us that children who do not know their
parents, especially their father undergo severe mental trauma and disturbances.
Often they have an unhappy childhood. It is for this reason that the children of
prostitutes do not have a healthy childhood. If a child born of such wedlock is
admitted in school, and when the mother is asked the name of the father, she
would have to give two or more names! I am aware that recent advances in science
have made it possible for both the mother and father to be identified with the
help of genetic testing. Thus this point which was applicable for the past may
not be applicable for the present.
2. Man is more polygamous by nature as compared to a woman.
3. Biologically, it is easier for a man to perform his duties as a husband
despite having several wives. A woman, in a similar position, having several
husbands, will not find it possible to perform her duties as a wife. A woman
undergoes several psychological and behavioral changes due to different phases
of the menstrual cycle.
4. A woman who has more than one husband will have several sexual partners at
the same time and has a high chance of acquiring venereal or sexually
transmitted diseases which can also be transmitted back to her husband even if
all of them have no extra-marital sex. This is not the case in a man having more
than one wife, and none of them having extra-marital sex.
The above reasons are those that one can easily identify. There are probably
many more reasons why Allah, in His Infinite Wisdom, has prohibited polyandry.
HIJAAB
FOR WOMEN
Question:
Why does Islam degrade women
by keeping them behind the veil?``
Answer:
The status of women in Islam
is often the target of attacks in the secular media. The ‘hijaab’ or the
Islamic dress is cited by many as an example of the ‘subjugation’ of women under
Islamic law. Before we analyze the reasoning behind the religiously mandated ‘hijaab’,
let us first study the status of women in societies before the advent of Islam
1. In the past women were degraded and used as objects of lust
The following examples from
history amply illustrate the fact that the status of women in earlier
civilizations was very low to the extent that they were denied basic human
dignity:
-
Babylonian Civilization:
The women were degraded and were denied all rights under the Babylonian law.
If a man murdered a woman, instead of him being punished, his wife was put to
death.
-
Greek Civilization:
Greek Civilization is considered the most glorious of all ancient
civilizations. Under this very ‘glorious’ system, women were deprived of all
rights and were looked down upon. In Greek mythology, an ‘imaginary woman’
called ‘Pandora’ is the root cause of misfortune of human beings. The Greeks
considered women to be subhuman and inferior to men. Though chastity of women
was precious, and women were held in high esteem, the Greeks were later
overwhelmed by ego and sexual perversions. Prostitution became a regular
practice amongst all classes of Greek society.
-
Roman Civilization:
When Roman Civilization was at the zenith of its ‘glory’, a man even had the
right to take the life of his wife. Prostitution and nudity were common
amongst the Romans.
-
Egyptian Civilization:
The Egyptian considered women evil and as a sign of a devil.
-
Pre-Islamic Arabia:
Before Islam spread in Arabia,
the Arabs looked down upon women and very often when a female child was born,
she was buried alive.
2. Islam uplifted women and gave them equality and expects them to maintain
their status.
Islam uplifted the status of
women and granted them their just rights 1400 years ago. Islam expects women to
maintain their status.
Hijaab
for men
People usually only discuss
‘hijaab’ in the context of women. However, in the Glorious Qur’an, Allah
first mentions ‘hijaab’ for men before ‘hijaab’ for the women. The
Qur’an mentions in Surah Noor:
"Say to the believing men
that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty: that will make for
greater purity for them: and Allah is well acquainted with all that they do."
[Al-Qur’an 24:30]
The moment a man looks at a
woman and if any brazen or unashamed thought comes to his mind, he should lower
his gaze.
Hijaab
for women.
The next verse of Surah Noor,
says:
" And say to the believing
women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that they
should not display their beauty and ornaments except what (must ordinarily)
appear thereof; that they should draw veils over their bosoms and not display
their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers,
their sons..."
[Al-Qur’an 24:31]
3. Six criteria for Hijaab.
According to Qur’an and
Sunnah there are basically six criteria for observing hijaab:
-
Extent:
The first criterion is the extent of the body that should be covered. This is
different for men and women. The extent of covering obligatory on the male is
to cover the body at least from the navel to the knees. For women, the extent
of covering obligatory is to cover the complete body except the face and the
hands upto the wrist. If they wish to, they can cover even these parts of the
body. Some scholars of Islam insist that the face and the hands are part of
the obligatory extent of ‘hijaab’.
All the remaining five
criteria are the same for men and women.
-
The clothes worn should be
loose and should not reveal the figure.
-
The clothes worn should
not be transparent such that one can see through them.
-
The clothes worn should
not be so glamorous as to attract the opposite sex.
-
The clothes worn should
not resemble that of the opposite sex.
-
The clothes worn should
not resemble that of the unbelievers i.e. they should not wear clothes that
are specifically identities or symbols of the unbelievers’ religions.
4. Hijaab includes conduct and behaviour among other things
Complete ‘hijaab’,
besides the six criteria of clothing, also includes the moral conduct, behaviour,
attitude and intention of the individual. A person only fulfilling the criteria
of ‘hijaab’ of the clothes is observing ‘hijaab’ in a limited
sense. ‘Hijaab’ of the clothes should be accompanied by ‘hijaab’
of the eyes, ‘hijaab’ of the heart, ‘hijaab’ of thought and ‘hijaab’
of intention. It also includes the way a person walks, the way a person talks,
the way he behaves, etc.
5. Hijaab prevents molestation
The reason why Hijaab
is prescribed for women is mentioned in the Qur’an in the following verses of
Surah Al-Ahzab:
"O Prophet! Tell thy wives
and daughters, and the believing women that they should cast their outer
garments over their persons (when abroad); that is most convenient, that they
should be known (as such) and not molested. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most
Merciful."
[Al-Qur’an 33:59]
The Qur’an says that
Hijaab has been prescribed for the women so that they are recognized as
modest women and this will also prevent them from being molested.
6. Example of twin sisters
Suppose two sisters who are
twins, and who are equally beautiful, walk down the street. One of them is
attired in the Islamic hijaab i.e. the complete body is covered, except
for the face and the hands up to the wrists. The other sister is wearing western
clothes, a mini skirt or shorts. Just around the corner there is a hooligan or
ruffian who is waiting for a catch, to tease a girl. Whom will he tease? The
girl wearing the Islamic Hijaab or the girl wearing the skirt or the
mini? Naturally he will tease the girl wearing the skirt or the mini. Such
dresses are an indirect invitation to the opposite sex for teasing and
molestation. The Qur’an rightly says that hijaab prevents women from
being molested.
7. Capital punishment for the rapists
Under the Islamic shariah,
a man convicted of having raped a woman, is given capital punishment. Many are
astonished at this ‘harsh’ sentence. Some even say that Islam is a ruthless,
barbaric religion! I have asked a simple question to hundreds of non-Muslim men.
Suppose, God forbid, someone rapes your wife, your mother or your sister. You
are made the judge and the rapist is brought in front of you. What punishment
would you give him? All of them said they would put him to death. Some went to
the extent of saying they would torture him to death. To them I ask, if someone
rapes your wife or your mother you want to put him to death. But if the same
crime is committed on somebody else’s wife or daughter you say capital
punishment is barbaric. Why should there be double standards?
8. Western society falsely claims to have uplifted women
Western talk of women’s
liberalization is nothing but a disguised form of exploitation of her body,
degradation of her soul, and deprivation of her honour. Western society claims
to have ‘uplifted’ women. On the contrary it has actually degraded them to the
status of concubines, mistresses and society butterflies who are mere tools in
the hands of pleasure seekers and sex marketers, hidden behind the colourful
screen of ‘art’ and ‘culture’.
9. USA
has one of the highest rates of rape
United States of America is
supposed to be one of the most advanced countries of the world. It also has one
of the highest rates of rape in any country in the world. According to a FBI
report, in the year 1990, every day on an average 1756 cases of rape were
committed in U.S.A alone. Later another report said that on an average everyday
1900 cases of rapes are committed in USA.
The year was not mentioned. May be it was 1992 or 1993. May be the Americans got
‘bolder’ in the following years.
Consider a scenario where
the Islamic hijaab is followed in America. Whenever a man looks at a
woman and any brazen or unashamed thought comes to his mind, he lowers his gaze.
Every woman wears the Islamic hijaab, that is the complete body is
covered except the face and the hands upto the wrist. After this if any man
commits rape he is given capital punishment. I ask you, in such a scenario, will
the rate of rape in America increase, will it remain the same, or will it
decrease?
10. Implementation of Islamic Shariah will reduce the rate of rapes
Naturally as soon as Islamic
Shariah is implemented positive results will be inevitable. If Islamic
Shariah is implemented in any part of the world, whether it is America or
Europe, society will breathe easier. Hijaab does not degrade a woman but
uplifts a woman and protects her modesty and chastity.
Question:
How can Islam be called the
religion of peace when it was spread by the sword?
Answer:
It is a common complaint
among some non-Muslims that Islam would not have millions of adherents all over
the world, if it had not been spread by the use of force. The following points
will make it clear, that far from being spread by the sword, it was the inherent
force of truth, reason and logic that was responsible for the rapid spread of
Islam.
1. Islam means peace.
Islam comes from the root
word ‘salaam’, which means peace. It also means submitting one’s will to
Allah (swt). Thus Islam is a religion of peace, which is acquired by submitting
one’s will to the will of the Supreme Creator, Allah (swt).
2. Sometimes force has to be used to maintain peace.
Each and every human being
in this world is not in favour of maintaining peace and harmony. There are many,
who would disrupt it for their own vested interests. Sometimes force has to be
used to maintain peace. It is precisely for this reason that we have the police
who use force against criminals and anti-social elements to maintain peace in
the country. Islam promotes peace. At the same time, Islam exhorts it followers
to fight where there is oppression. The fight against oppression may, at times,
require the use of force. In Islam force can only be used to promote peace and
justice.
3. Opinion of historian De Lacy O’Leary.
The best reply to the
misconception that Islam was spread by the sword is given by the noted historian
De Lacy O’Leary in the book "Islam at the cross road" (Page 8):
"History makes it clear
however, that the legend of fanatical Muslims sweeping through the world and
forcing Islam at the point of the sword upon conquered races is one of the most
fantastically absurd myth that historians have ever repeated."
4. Muslims ruled
Spain for 800 years.
Muslims ruled Spain for
about 800 years. The Muslims in Spain
never used the sword to force the people to convert. Later the Christian
Crusaders came to
Spain and wiped out the Muslims. There was not a single Muslim in Spain who
could openly give the adhan, that is the call for prayers.
5. 14 million Arabs are Coptic Christians.
Muslims were the lords of
Arabia for 1400 years. For a few years the British ruled, and for a few years
the French ruled. Overall, the Muslims ruled Arabia for 1400 years. Yet today,
there are 14 million Arabs who are Coptic Christians i.e. Christians since
generations. If the Muslims had used the sword there would not have been a
single Arab who would have remained a Christian.
6. More than 80% non-Muslims in
India.
The Muslims ruled India for
about a thousand years. If they wanted, they had the power of converting each
and every non-Muslim of India to Islam. Today more than 80% of the population of India
are non-Muslims. All these non-Muslim Indians are bearing witness today that
Islam was not spread by the sword.
7.
Indonesia
and Malaysia.
Indonesia is a country that
has the maximum number of Muslims in the world. The majority of people in
Malaysia are Muslims. May one ask, "Which Muslim army went to Indonesia and
Malaysia?"
8. East Coast of
Africa.
Similarly, Islam has spread
rapidly on the East Coast of Africa. One may again ask, if Islam was spread by
the sword, "Which Muslim army went to the East Coast of Africa?"
9. Thomas Carlyle.
The famous historian, Thomas
Carlyle, in his book "Heroes and Hero worship", refers to this misconception
about the spread of Islam: "The sword indeed, but where will you get your sword?
Every new opinion, at its starting is precisely in a minority of one. In one
man’s head alone. There it dwells as yet. One man alone of the whole world
believes it, there is one man against all men. That he takes a sword and try to
propagate with that, will do little for him. You must get your sword! On the
whole, a thing will propagate itself as it can."
10. No compulsion in religion.
With which sword was Islam
spread? Even if Muslims had it they could not use it to spread Islam because the
Qur’an says in the following verse:
"Let there be no compulsion
in religion,Truth stands out clear from error" [Al-Qur’an 2:256]
11. Sword of the Intellect.
It is the sword of
intellect. The sword that conquers the hearts and minds of people. The Qur’an
says in Surah Nahl, chapter 16 verse 125:
"Invite (all) to the way of
thy Lord
with wisdom and beautiful preaching;
and argue with them in ways that are
best and most gracious." [Al-Qur’an 16:125]
12. Increase in the world religions from 1934 to 1984.
An article in Reader’s
Digest ‘Almanac’, year book 1986, gave the statistics of the increase of
percentage of the major religions of the world in half a century from 1934 to
1984. This article also appeared in ‘The Plain Truth’ magazine. At the top was
Islam, which increased by 235%, and Christianity had increased only by 47%. May
one ask, which war took place in this century which converted millions of people
to Islam?
13. Islam is the fastest growing religion in
America and Europe.
Today the fastest growing
religion in America
is Islam. The fastest growing religion in Europe in Islam. Which sword is
forcing people in the West to accept Islam in such large numbers?
14. Dr. Joseph Adam Pearson.
Dr. Joseph Adam Pearson
rightly says, "People who worry that nuclear weaponry will one day fall in the
hands of the Arabs, fail to realize that the Islamic bomb has been dropped
already, it fell the day MUHAMMED (pbuh) was born".
Question:
Why are most of the Muslims
fundamentalists and terrorists?
Answer:
This question is often
hurled at Muslims, either directly or indirectly, during any discussion on
religion or world affairs. Muslim stereotypes are perpetuated in every form of
the media accompanied by gross misinformation about Islam and Muslims. In fact,
such misinformation and false propaganda often leads to discrimination and acts
of violence against Muslims. A case in point is the anti-Muslim campaign in the
American media following the Oklahoma bomb blast, where the press was quick to
declare a ‘Middle Eastern conspiracy’ behind the attack. The culprit was later
identified as a soldier from the American Armed Forces.
Let us analyze this
allegation of ‘fundamentalism’ and ‘terrorism’:
1. Definition of the word ‘fundamentalist’
A fundamentalist is a person
who follows and adheres to the fundamentals of the doctrine or theory he is
following. For a person to be a good doctor, he should know, follow, and
practise the fundamentals of medicine. In other words, he should be a
fundamentalist in the field of medicine. For a person to be a good
mathematician, he should know, follow and practise the fundamentals of
mathematics. He should be a fundamentalist in the field of mathematics. For a
person to be a good scientist, he should know, follow and practise the
fundamentals of science. He should be a fundamentalist in the field of science.
2. Not all ‘fundamentalists’ are the same
One cannot paint all
fundamentalists with the same brush. One cannot categorize all fundamentalists
as either good or bad. Such a categorization of any fund amentalist will depend
upon the field or activity in which he is a fundamentalist. A fundamentalist
robber or thief causes harm to society and is therefore undesirable. A
fundamentalist doctor, on the other hand, benefits society and earns much
respect.
3. I am proud to be a Muslim fundamentalist
I am a fundamentalist Muslim
who, by the grace of Allah, knows, follows and strives to practise the
fundamentals of Islam. A true Muslim does not shy away from being a
fundamentalist. I am proud to be a fundamentalist Muslim because, I know that
the fundamentals of Islam are beneficial to humanity and the whole world. There
is not a single fundamental of Islam that causes harm or is against the
interests of the human race as a whole. Many people harbour misconceptions about
Islam and consider several teachings of Islam to be unfair or improper. This is
due to insufficient and incorrect knowledge of Islam. If one critically analyzes
the teachings of Islam with an open mind, one cannot escape the fact that Islam
is full of benefits both at the individual and collective levels.
4. Dictionary meaning of the word ‘fundamentalist’
According to Webster’s
dictionary ‘fundamentalism’ was a movement in American Protestanism that arose
in the earlier part of the 20th century. It was a reaction to modernism, and
stressed the infallibility of the Bible, not only in matters of faith and morals
but also as a literal historical record. It stressed on belief in the Bible as
the literal word of God. Thus fundamentalism was a word initially used for a
group of Christians who believed that the Bible was the verbatim word of God
without any errors and mistakes.
According to the Oxford
dictionary ‘fundamentalism’ means ‘strict maintenance of ancient
or fundamental doctrines of any religion, especially Islam’.
Today the moment a person
uses the word fundamentalist he thinks of a Muslim who is a terrorist.
5. Every Muslim should be a terrorist
Every Muslim should be a
terrorist. A terrorist is a person who causes terror. The moment a robber sees a
policeman he is terrified. A policeman is a terrorist for the robber. Similarly
every Muslim should be a terrorist for the antisocial elements of society, such
as thieves, dacoits and rapists. Whenever such an anti-social element sees a
Muslim, he should be terrified. It is true that the word ‘terrorist’ is
generally used for a person who causes terror among the common people. But a
true Muslim should only be a terrorist to selective people i.e. anti-social
elements, and not to the common innocent people. In fact a Muslim should be a
source of peace for innocent people.
6. Different labels given to the same individual for the same action, i.e.
‘terrorist’ and ‘patriot’
Before India achieved
independence from British rule, some freedom fighters of India who did not
subscribe to non-violence were labeled as terrorists by the British government.
The same individuals have been lauded by Indians for the same activities and
hailed as ‘patriots’. Thus two different labels have been given to the same
people for the same set of actions. One is calling him a terrorist while the
other is calling him a patriot. Those who believed that Britain had a right to
rule over India called these people terrorists, while those who were of the view
that Britain had no right to rule India called them patriots and freedom
fighters.
It is therefore important
that before a person is judged, he is given a fair hearing. Both sides of the
argument should be heard, the situation should be analyzed, and the reason and
the intention of the person should be taken into account, and then the person
can be judged accordingly.
7. Islam means peace
Islam is derived from the
word ‘salaam’ which means peace. It is a religion of peace whose
fundamentals teach its followers to maintain and promote peace throughout the
world.
Thus every Muslim should be
a fundamentalist i.e. he should follow the fundamentals of the Religion of
Peace: Islam. He should be a terrorist only towards the antisocial elements in
order to promote peace and justice in the society.
EATING NON-VEGETARIAN FOOD
Question:
Killing an animal is a
ruthless act. Why then do Muslims consume non-vegetarian food?
Answer:
‘Vegetarianism’ is now a
movement the world over. Many even associate it with animal rights.
Indeed, a large number of people consider the consumption of meat and other
non-vegetarian products to be a violation of animal rights.
Islam enjoins mercy and
compassion for all living creatures. At the same time Islam maintains that Allah
has created the earth and its wondrous flora and fauna for the benefit of
mankind. It is upto mankind to use every resource in this world judiciously, as
a niyamat (Divine blessing) and amanat (trust) from Allah.
Let us look at various other
aspects of this argument.
1. A Muslim can be a pure vegetarian
A Muslim can be a very good
Muslim despite being a pure vegetarian. It is not compulsory for a Muslim to
have non-vegetarian food.
2. Qur’an permits Muslims to have non-vegetarian food
The Qur’an, however permits
a Muslim to have non-vegetarian food. The following Qur’anic verses are proof of
this fact:
"O ye who believe! Fulfil
(all) obligations. Lawful unto you (for food) are all four-footed animals with
the exceptions named." [Al-Qur’an 5:1]
"And cattle He has
created for you (men): from them Ye derive warmth, and numerous benefits, And of
their (meat) ye eat." [Al-Qur’an 16:5]
"And in cattle (too) ye have
an instructive example: From within their bodies We produce (milk) for you to
drink; there are, in them, (besides), numerous (other) benefits for you; and of
their (meat) ye eat."[Al-Qur’an 23:21]
3. Meat is nutritious and rich in complete protein
Non-vegetarian food is a
good source of excellent protein. It contains biologically complete protein i.e.
all the 8 essential amino acid that are not synthesized by the body and should
be supplied in the diet. Meat also contains iron, vitamin B1 and niacin.
4. Humans have Omnivorous set of teeth
If you observe the teeth of
herbivorous animals like the cow, goat and sheep, you will find something
strikingly similar in all of them. All these animals have a set of flat teeth
i.e. suited for herbivorous diet. If you observe the set of teeth of the
carnivorous animals like the lion, tiger, or leopard, they all have a set of
pointed teeth i.e. suited for a carnivorous diet. If you analyze the set of
teeth of humans, you find that they have flat teeth as well as pointed teeth.
Thus they have teeth suited for both herbivorous as well as carnivorous food
i.e. they are omnivorous. One may ask, if Almighty God wanted humans to have
only vegetables, why did He provide us also with pointed teeth? It is logical
that He expected us to need and to have both vegetarian as well as
non-vegetarian food.
5. Human beings can digest both vegetarian and non-vegetarian food
The digestive system of
herbivorous animals can digest only vegetables. The digestive system of
carnivorous animals can digest only meat. But the digestive system of humans can
digest both vegetarian and non-vegetarian food. If Almighty God wanted us to
have only vegetables then why did He give us a digestive system that can digest
both vegetarian as well as non-vegetarian food?
6. Hindu scriptures give permission to have non-vegetarian food
-
There are many Hindus who
are strictly vegetarian. They think it is against their religion to consume
non-vegetarian food. But the true fact is that the Hindu scriptures permit a
person to have meat. The scriptures mention Hindu sages and saints consuming
non-vegetarian food.
-
It is mentioned in Manu
Smruti, the law book of Hindus, in chapter 5 verse 30
"The eater who eats the flesh of those to be eaten does nothing bad, even if
he does it day after day, for God himself created some to be eaten and some to
be eater."
-
Again next verse of Manu
Smruti, that is, chapter 5 verse 31 says
"Eating meat is right for the sacrifice, this is traditionally known as
a rule of the gods."
-
Further in Manu Smruti
chapter 5 verse 39 and 40 says
"God himself created sacrificial animals for sacrifice, ...., therefore
killing in a sacrifice is not killing."
-
Mahabharata Anushashan
Parva chapter 88 narrates the discussion between Dharmaraj Yudhishthira and
Pitamah Bhishma about what food one should offer to Pitris (ancestors)
during the Shraddha (ceremony of dead) to keep them satisfied.
Paragraph reads as follows:
"Yudhishthira said, "O thou
of great puissance, tell me what that object is which, if dedicated to the
Pitiris (dead ancestors), become inexhaustible! What Havi,
again, (if offered) lasts for all time? What, indeed, is that which (if
presented) becomes eternal?"
"Bhishma said, "Listen to
me, O Yudhishthira, what those Havis are which persons conversant with
the rituals of the Shraddha (the ceremony of dead) regard as suitable in
view of Shraddha and what the fruits are that attach to each. With sesame
seeds and rice and barely and Masha and water and roots and fruits, if
given at Shraddhas, the pitris, O king, remain gratified
for the period of a month. With fishes offered at Shraddhas, the
pitris remain gratified for a period of two months. With the mutton they
remain gratified for three months and with the hare for four months, with the
flesh of the goat for five months, with the bacon (meat of pig) for six months,
and with the flesh of birds for seven. With venison obtained from those deer
that are called Prishata, they remaingratified for eight months,
and with that obtained from the Ruru for nine months, and with the meat
of Gavaya for ten months, With the meat of the bufffalo their
gratification lasts for eleven months. With beef presented at the Shraddha,
their gratification, it is said , lasts for a full year. Payasa mixed
with ghee is as much acceptable to the pitris as beef. With the
meat of Vadhrinasa (a large bull) the gratification of pitris lasts for
twelve years. The flesh of rhinoceros, offered to the pitris on
anniversaries of the lunar days on which they died, becomes inexhaustible. The
potherb called Kalaska, the petals of kanchana flower, and meat of
(red) goat also, thus offered, prove inexhaustible.
So but natural if you want
to keep your ancestors satisfied forever, you should serve them the meat of red
goat.
7. Hinduism was influenced by other religions
Though Hindu Scriptures
permit its followers to have non-vegetarian food, many Hindus adopted the
vegetarian system because they were influenced by other religions like Jainism.
8. Even plants have life
Certain religions have
adopted pure vegetarianism as a dietary law because they are totally against the
killing of living creatures. If a person can survive without killing any living
creature, I would be the first person to adopt such a way of life. In the past
people thought plants were lifeless. Today it is a universal fact that even
plants have life. Thus their logic of not killing living creatures is not
fulfilled even by being a pure vegetarian.
9. Even plants can feel pain
They further argue that
plants cannot feel pain, therefore killing a plant is a lesser crime as compared
to killing an animal. Today science tells us that even plants can feel pain. But
the cry of the plant cannot be heard by the human being. This is due to the
inability of the human ear to hear sounds that are not in the audible range i.e.
20 Hertz to 20,000 Hertz. Anything below and above this range cannot be heard by
a human being. A dog can hear up to 40,000 Hertz. Thus there are silent dog
whistles that have a frequency of more than 20,000 Hertz and less than 40,000
Hertz. These whistles are only heard by dogs and not by human beings. The dog
recognizes the masters whistle and comes to the master. There was research done
by a farmer in U.S.A. who invented an instrument which converted the cry of the
plant so that it could be heard by human beings. He was able to realize
immediately when the plant itself cried for water. Latest researches show that
the plants can even feel happy and sad. It can also cry.
10. Killing a living creature with two senses less is not a lesser crime
Once a vegetarian argued his
case by saying that plants only have two or three senses while the animals have
five senses.
Therefore killing a plant is
a lesser crime than killing an animal. Suppose your brother is born deaf and
dumb and has two senses less as compared to other human beings. He becomes
mature and someone murders him. Would you ask the judge to give the murderer a
lesser punishment because your brother has two senses less? In fact you would
say that he has killed a masoom, an innocent person, and the judge should
give the murderer a greater punishment.
In fact the Qur’an says:
"O ye people! Eat of what is
on earth, lawful and good" [Al-Qur’an 2:168]
11. Over population of cattle
If every human being was a
vegetarian, it would lead to overpopulation of cattle in the world, since their
reproduction and multiplication is very swift. Allah (swt) in His Divine Wisdom
knows how to maintain the balance of His creation appropriately. No wonder He
has permitted us to have the meat of the cattle.
12. Cost of meat is reasonable since all aren’t non-vegetarians
I do not mind if some people
are pure vegetarians. However they should not condemn non-vegetarians as
ruthless. In fact if all Indians become non-vegetarians then the present
non-vegetarians would be losers since the prices of meat would rise.
NON-VEGETARIAN FOOD MAKES
MUSLIMS VIOLENT
Question:
Science tell us that
whatever one eats, it has an effect on one’s behaviour. Why then, does Islam
allow Muslims to eat non-vegetarian food, since eating of animals could make a
person violent and ferocious?
Answer:
1. Only eating of herbivorous animals allowed
I agree that, what a person
eats has an effect on his behaviour. This is one of the reasons why Islam
prohibits the eating of carnivorous animals like lion, tiger, leopard, etc. who
are violent and ferocious. The consumption of the meat of such animals would
probably make a person violent and ferocious. Islam only allows the eating of
herbivorous animals like cow, goat, sheep, etc. that are peaceful and docile. We
Muslims eat peaceful and docile animals because we are peace loving and
non-violent people.
2. The Qur’an says Prophet prohibits what is bad
The Qur’an says:
"The Prophet commands them
what is just and prohibits what is evil". "He allows them as lawful what is good
(and pure) and prohibits them what is bad (and impure),"
[Al-Qur’an 7: 157]
"So take what the Messenger
assigns to you and deny yourselves that which he withholds from you."
[Al-Qur’an 59: 7]
For a Muslim, the Prophet’s
statement is sufficient to convince him that Allah does not wish humans to eat
some kinds of meat while allowing some other kinds.
3. Hadith of Mohammad (pbuh) prohibiting eating of carnivorous animals
According to various
authentic Ahadith narrated in Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim including hadith
narrated by Ibn Abbas in Sahih Muslim, Book of hunting and slaughter, Hadith No.
4752 and Sunan Ibn-I-Majah chapter 13 Hadith no. 3232 to 3234, the Holy Prophet
(pbuh) prohibited the eating of:
-
Wild animals with canine
teeth, i.e. meat eating carnivorous animals. These are animals belonging to
the cat families such as lion, tiger, cats, dogs, wolfs, hyenas, etc.
-
Certain rodents like mice,
rats, rabbits with claws, etc.
-
Certain reptiles like
snakes, alligators, etc.
-
Birds of prey with talons
or claws, like vultures, eagle, crows, owl, etc.
MUSLIMS
WORSHIP THE KAABA
Question:
When Islam is against idol
worship why do the Muslims worship, and bow down to the Kaaba in their
prayer?
Answer:
Kaaba
is the Qibla i.e. the
direction Muslims face during their prayers. It is important to note that though
Muslims face the Kaaba during prayers, they do not worship the Kaaba.
Muslims worship and bow to none but Allah.
It is mentioned in Surah
Baqarah:
"We see the turning of thy
face (for guidance) to the heavens: now shall We turn thee to a Qiblah
that shall please thee. Turn then thy face in the direction of the Sacred
Mosque: wherever ye are, turn your faces in that direction."[Al-Qur’an 2:144]
1. Islam believes in fostering unity
For instance, if Muslims
want to offer Salaah (Prayer), it is possible that some may wish to face
north, while some may wish to face south. In order to unite Muslims in their
worship of the One True God, Muslims, wherever they may be, are asked to face in
only one direction i.e. towards the Kaaba. If some Muslims live towards
the west of the Kaaba they face the east. Similarly if they live towards
the east of the Kaaba they face the west.
2. Kaaba is at the Centre of the World Map
The Muslims were the first
people to draw the map of the world. They drew the map with the south facing
upwards and north downwards. The Kaaba was at the centre. Later, western
cartographers drew the map upside down with the north facing upwards and south
downwards. Yet, Alhamdullilah the Kaaba is at the centre of the
world map.
3. Tawaaf around Kaaba for indicating one God
When the Muslims go to
Masjid-e-Haram in Makkah, they perform tawaaf or circumambulation
round the Kaaba. This act symbolizes the belief and worship of One God,
since, just as every circle has one centre, so also there is only one Allah (swt)
worthy of worship.
4. Hadith of Umar (may Allah be pleased with him)
Regarding the black stone,
hajr-e-aswad, there is a hadith (tradition), attributed to the
illustrious companion of the Prophet Muhammed (pbuh), Umar (may Allah be pleased
with him).
According to Sahih Bukhari,
Volume 2, book of Hajj, chapter 56, H.No. 675. Umar (may Allah be pleased with
him) said, "I know that you are a stone and can neither benefit nor harm. Had I
not seen the Prophet (pbuh) touching (and kissing) you, I would never have
touched (and kissed) you".
5. People stood on Kaaba and gave the adhaan
At the time of the Prophet, people even stood on the Kaaba and gave the ‘adhaan’
or the call to prayer. One may ask those who allege that Muslims worship the
Kaaba; which idol worshipper stands on the idol he worships?
PORK FORBIDDEN
Question:
Why is the eating of pork
forbidden in Islam?
Answer:
The fact that consumption of
pork is prohibited in Islam is well known. The following points explain various
aspects of this prohibition:
1. Pork prohibited in Qur’an
The Qur’an prohibits the
consumption of pork in no less than 4 different places. It is prohibited in
2:173, 5:3, 6:145 and 16:115.
"Forbidden to you (for food)
are: dead meat, blood, the flesh of swine, and that on which hath been invoked
the name of other than Allah." [Al-Qur’an 5:3]
The above verses of the Holy
Qur’an are sufficient to satisfy a Muslim as to why pork is forbidden.
2. Pork prohibited in the Bible
The Christian is likely to
be convinced by his religious scriptures. The Bible prohibits the consumption of
pork, in the book of Leviticus
"And the swine, though he
divide the hoof, and be cloven footed, yet he cheweth not the cud; he is unclean
to you".
"Of their flesh shall ye not
eat, and their carcass shall ye not touch, they are unclean to you."
[Leviticus 11:7-8]
Pork is also prohibited in
the Bible in the book of Deuteronomy
"And the swine, because it
divideth the hoof, yet cheweth not the cud, it is unclean unto you. Ye shall not
eat of their flesh, nor touch their dead carcass." [Deuteronomy 14:8]
A similar prohibition is
repeated in the Bible in the book of Isaiah chapter 65 verse 2-5.
3. Consumption of pork causes several diseases
The other non-Muslims and
atheists will agree only if convinced through reason, logic and science. Eating
of pork can cause no less than seventy different types of diseases. A person can
have various helminthes like roundworm, pinworm, hookworm, etc. One of the most
dangerous is Taenia Solium, which is in lay man’s terminology called tapeworm.
It harbours in the intestine and is very long. Its ova i.e. eggs, enter the
blood stream and can reach almost all the organs of the body. If it enters the
brain it can cause memory loss. If it enters the heart it can cause heart
attack, if it enters the eye it can cause blindness, if it enters the liver it
can cause liver damage. It can damage almost all the organs of the body.
Another dangerous helminthes
is Trichura Tichurasis. A common misconception about pork is that if it is
cooked well, these ova die. In a research project undertaken in America, it was
found that out of twenty-four people suffering from Trichura Tichurasis, twenty
two had cooked the pork very well. This indicates that the ova present in the
pork do not die under normal cooking temperature.
4. Pork has fat building material
Pork has very little muscle
building material and contains excess of fat. This fat gets deposited in the
vessels and can cause hypertension and heart attack. It is not surprising that
over 50% of Americans suffer from hypertension.
5. Pig is one of the filthiest animals on earth
The pig is one of the
filthiest animals on earth. It lives and thrives on muck, faeces and dirt. It is
the best scavenger that I know that God has produced. In the villages they don’t
have modern toilets and the villagers excrete in the open air. Very often
excreta is cleared by pigs.
Some may argue that in
advanced countries like Australia,
pigs are bred in very clean and hygienic conditions. Even in these hygienic
conditions the pigs are kept together in sties. No matter how hard you try to
keep them clean they are filthy by nature. They eat and enjoy their own as well
as their neighbour’s excreta.
6. Pig is the most shameless animal
The pig is the most
shameless animal on the face of the earth. It is the only animal that invites
its friends to have sex with its mate. In America, most people consume pork.
Many times after dance parties, they have swapping of wives; i.e. many say "you
sleep with my wife and I will sleep with your wife." If you eat pigs then you
behave like pigs. We Indians look upon America to be very advanced and
sophisticated. Whatever they do, we follow after a few years. According to an
article in Island magazine, this practice of swapping wives has become common in
the affluent circles of Bombay.
PROHIBITION OF ALCOHOL
Question:
Why is the consumption of
alcohol prohibited in Islam?
Answer:
Alcohol has been the scourge
of human society since time immemorial. It continues to cost countless human
lives, and causes terrible misery to millions throughout the world. Alcohol is
the root cause of several problems facing society. The statistics of soaring
crime rates, increasing instances of mental illnesses and millions of broken
homes throughout the world bear mute testimony to the destructive power of
alcohol.
1. Prohibition of alcohol in the Qur’an
The Glorious Qur’an
prohibits the consumption of alcohol in the following verse:
"O ye who believe!
Intoxicants and Gambling,
(Dedication of) stones,
And (divination by) arrows,Are an Abomination –
Of Satan’s handiwork;
Eschew such (abomination),T hat ye may prosper."[Al-Qur’an 5:90]
2. Prohibition of alcohol in the Bible
The Bible prohibits the
consumption of alcohol in the following verses:
-
"Wine is a mocker, strong
drink is raging; and whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise."
[Proverbs 20:1]
-
"And be not drunk with
wine."
[Ephesians 5:18]
3. Alcohol inhibits the inhibitory centre
The human beings possess an inhibitory centre in their brains. This inhibitory
centre prevents the person from doing things that he considers wrong. For
instance a person does not normally use abusive language while addressing his
parents or elders. If he has to answer the call of nature, his inhibitory centre
will prevent him from doing so in public. Therefore he uses the toilet.
When a person consumes
alcohol, the inhibitory centre itself is inhibited. That is precisely the reason
that an inebriated person is often found to be indulging in behaviour that is
completely uncharacteristic of him. For instance the intoxicated person is found
to use abusive and foul language and does not realize his mistake even if he is
addressing his parents. Many even urinate in their clothes. Neither do they talk
nor walk properly. They even misbehave.
4. Cases of adultery, rape, incest and AIDS are found more among alcoholics
According to National Crime Victimization Survey Bureau of Justice (U.S.
Department of Justice) in the year 1996 alone everyday on an average 2,713 rapes
took place. The statistics tell us that the majority of the rapists, were
intoxicated while committing the crime. The same is true in cases of
molestation.
According to statistics, 8%
of Americans commit incest i.e. one in every twelve to thirteen persons in
America is involved in incest. Almost all the cases of incest are due to
intoxication of one or both the persons involved.
One of the major factors
associated with the spread of AIDS, the most dreaded disease, is alcoholism.
5. Every alcoholic was initially a social drinker
Many may argue in favour of liquor by calling themselves ‘social drinkers’. They
claim that they only have one or two pegs and they have self-control and so
never get intoxicated. Investigations reveal that every alcoholic started as a
social drinker. Not a single alcoholic or drunkard initially starts drinking
with the intention of becoming an alcoholic or a drunkard. No social drinker can
say that I have been having alcohol for several years and that I have so much
self-control that I have never been intoxicated even a single time.
6. If a person is intoxicated just once and commits something shameful, it
will remain with him for a lifetime.
Suppose a ‘social drinker’ loses his self-control just once. In a state of
intoxication he commits rape or incest. Even if the act is later regretted, a
normal human being is likely to carry the guilt throughout his life. Both the
perpetrator and the victim are irreparably and irreversibly damaged.
7. Alcohol is prohibited in the Hadith
The Prophet of Islam Muhammad (peace be upon him) said:
-
In Sunan Ibn-I-Majah
Volume 3, Book of Intoxicants, Chapter 30 Hadith No. 3371.
"Alcohol is the mother of all evils and it is the most shameful of evils."
-
In Sunan Ibn-I-Majah
Volume 3, Book of Intoxicants, Chapter 30 Hadith No. 3392
"Anything which intoxicates in a large quantity, is prohibited even in a small
quantity."
Thus there is no excuse for
a nip or a tot.
-
Not only those who drink
alcohol are cursed but also those who deal with them directly or indirectly
are cursed by Allah.
According to Sunan
Ibn-I-Majah Volume 3, Book of Intoxicants, Chapter 30 Hadith No. 3380.
It was reported by Anas (may
Allah be pleased with him), that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) said:
"God’s curse falls on ten
groups of people who deal with alcohol. The one who distills it, the one for
whom it has been distilled, the one who drinks it, the one who transports it,
the one to who it has been brought, the one whom serves it, the one who sells
it, the one who utilizes money from it, the one who buys it and the one who buys
it for someone else."
8. Diseases associated with alcoholism
There are several scientific reasons for the prohibition of consumption of
intoxicants i.e. alcohol. The maximum number of deaths in the world related to
any one particular cause is due to the consumption of alcohol. Millions of
people die every year only because of intake of alcohol. I need not go into the
details of all the ill-effects of alcohol since most of them are commonly known.
Below is a simple list of few of the alcohol related illnesses:
-
Cirrhosis of Liver is the
most well known alcohol associated disease.
-
Others are Cancer of
Oesophagus, Cancer of Head and Neck, Cancer of Liver (Hepatoma), Cancer of
Bowel, etc.
-
Oesophagitis, Gastritis,
Pancreatitis and Hepatitis are linked with alcohol consumption.
-
Cardiomyopathy,
Hypertension, Coronary Artherosclerosis, Angina and Heart Attacks are linked
with heavy alcohol intakes.
-
Strokes, Apoplexy, Fits
and different types of Paralysis are linked with alcohol intake.
-
Peripheral Neuropathy,
Cortical Atrophy, Cerebellar Atrophy are well-known syndromes caused by
alcohol consumption.
-
Wernicke – Korsakoff
syndrome with amnesia of recent events, confabulations and retainment of
memory to old events with different types of paralysis are mainly due to
thiamine deficiency due to excessive alcohol intake.
-
Beriberi and other
deficiencies are not uncommon among alcoholics. Even Pellagra occurs in
alcoholics.
-
Delerium Tremens is a
serious complication that may occur during recurrent infection of alcoholics
or post operatively. It also occurs during abstention as a sign of withdrawal
effect. It is quite serious and may cause death even if treated in well
equipped centres.
-
Numerous Endocrine
Disorders have been associated with alcoholism ranging from Myxodema to
Hyperthyroidism and Florid Cushing Syndrome.
-
Hematological ill effects
are long and variable. Folic acid deficiency, however, is the most common
manifestation of alcoholic abuse resulting in Macrocytic Anemia. Zeive’s
syndrome is a triad of Hemolytic Anemia, Jaundice and Hyperlipaedemia that
follows alcoholic binges.
-
Thrombocytopenia and other
platelet abnormalities are not rare in alcoholics.
-
The commonly used tablet
metronidazole (flagyl) interacts badly with alcohol.
-
Recurrent infection is
very common among chronic alcoholics. The resistance to disease and the
immunological defense system are compromised by alcohol intake.
-
Chest infections are
notorious in alcoholics. Pneumonia, Lung Abcess, Emphysema and Pulmonary
Tuberculosis are all common in alcoholics.
-
During acute alcoholic
intoxication, the drunk person usually vomits, the cough reflexes which are
protective are paralysed. The vomitus thus easily pass to the lung causing
Pneumonia or Lung Abscess. Occasionally it may even cause suffocation and
death.
-
The ill effects of alcohol
consumption on women deserves special mention. Females are more vulnerable to
alcohol-related Cirrhosis than men. During pregnancy alcohol consumption has a
severe detrimental effect on the foetus. Foetal Alcohol Syndrome is being
recognised more and more in the medical profession.
-
Skin diseases are also
related to alcohol indulgence.
-
Eczema, Alopecia, Nail
Dystrophy, Paronychia (infection around the nails) and Angular Stomatitis
(inflammation of the angle of the mouth) are common diseases among alcoholics.
9. Alcoholism is a ‘disease’
Medical doctors have now turned liberal towards alcoholics and call alcoholism a
disease rather than an addiction.
The Islamic Research
Foundation has published a pamphlet that says:
If alcohol is a disease, it
is the only disease that:
- Is sold in bottles
- Is advertised in
newspapers, magazines, on radio and television
- Has licensed outlets to
spread it
- Produces revenue for the
government
- Brings violent deaths on
the highways
- Destroys family life and
increases crime
- Has no germs or viral
cause
ALCOHOLISM IS NOT A DISEASE
– IT IS SATAN’S HANDIWORK
Allah (swt) in His Infinite
Wisdom has warned us against this snare of Satan. Islam is called the "Deen-ul-Fitrah"
or the natural religion of Man.
All its injunctions are aimed at preserving the natural state of man. Alcohol is
a deviation from this natural state, for the individual as well as for society.
It degrades man to a level below that of the beasts he claims to be superior to.
Hence the consumption of alcohol is prohibited in Islam.
ALL RELIGIONS TEACH MEN TO
BE RIGHTEOUS, THEN WHY FOLLOW ONLY ISLAM?
Question
All religions basically
teach followers to do good deeds. Why should a person only follow Islam? Can he
not follow any of the religions?
Answer
1. Major
difference between Islam and most other religions
All religions basically
exhort mankind to be righteous and eschew evil. But Islam goes beyond that. It
guides us towards practical ways of achieving righteousness and eliminating evil
from our individual and collective lives. Islam takes into account human nature
and the complexities of human society. Islam is guidance from the Creator
Himself. Therefore, Islam is also called the Deen-ul-Fitrah (the natural
religion of Man).
2.
Example - Islam commands us to shun robbery and also prescribes method of
eleminating robbery
-
Islam prescribes method of
eliminating robbery
All major
religions teach that theft is an evil act. Islam teaches the same. So what is
the difference between Islam and the other religions? The difference lies in
the fact that Islam, besides teaching that robbing is evil, shows a practical
way of creating a social structure in which people will not rob.
-
Islam prescribes Zakaat
Islam prescribes a system of Zakaat (obligatory annual charity).
Islamic law prescribes that every person who has a saving that exceeds the
nisaab level i.e. more than 85 grams of gold, should give 2.5% of that
saving every lunar year in charity. If every rich person in the world gave
Zakaat sincerely, poverty will be eradicated from this world. Not a single
human being would die of hunger.
-
Chopping off the hands as
punishment for robbery
Islam prescribes chopping off the hands of the convicted robber. The Glorious
Qur’an says in Surah Maidah:
"As to the thief, male or female, cut off his or her hands:a punishment by way
of example, from Allah, for their crime: and Allah is Exalted in power, full
of wisdom."
[ Al-Qur’an 5:38]
The non-Muslim may say, "Chopping off the hands in this 20th century. Islam is
a barbaric and ruthless religion!"
-
Results achieved when
Islamic Shariah Implemented
America
is supposed to be one of the most advanced countries in the world.
Unfortunately it also has one of the highest rates of crime, theft, and
robbery. Suppose the Islamic shariah is implemented in America i.e.
every rich person gives Zakaat ( 2.5% of his savings in charity above
85 grams of gold every lunar year), and every convicted robber has his or her
hands chopped off as a punishment. Will the rate of theft and robbery in
America increase, remain same or decrease? Naturally it will decrease.
Moreover the existence of such a stringent law would discourage many a
potential robber.
I agree that the amount of
theft that takes place in the world today is so tremendous that if you chop off
the hands of all the thieves, there will be tens of thousands of people whose
hands will be chopped off. The point here is that the moment you implement this
law the rate of theft will decline immediately. The potential robber would give
it a serious thought before jeopardizing his limbs. The mere thought of the
punishment itself will discourage majority of the robbers. There will barely be
a few who would rob. Hence only a few person’s hands would be chopped off but
millions would live peacefully without fear of being robbed.
Islamic Shariah is
therefore practical, and achieves results.
3. Example: Islam prohibits the molestation and rape of women. It enjoins
hijaab and prescribes capital punishment for a convicted rapist.
-
Islam prescribes method of
eliminating molestation and rape
All the major
religions declare the molestation and rape of women as grave sins. Islam
teaches the same. What then is the difference between Islam and the other
religions? The difference lies in the fact that Islam does not merely preach
respect for women, or abhor molestation and rape as serious crimes, but also
gives clear guidance as to how society can eliminate such crimes.
-
Hijaab
for men
Islam has a
system of hijaab. The Glorious Qur’an first mentions hijaab for
the men and then for the women. Hijaab for the men is mentioned in the
following verse:
"Say to the believing men
that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty: that will make for
greater purity for them: and Allah is well acquainted with all that they do."
[Al-Qur’an 24:30]
The moment a man looks at a
woman and if any brazen or unashamed thought comes to his mind, he should lower
his gaze.
-
Hijaab
for women
Hijaab
for women is mentioned in the following verse:
"And say to the believing
women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that they
should not display their beauty and ornaments except what (must ordinarily)
appear thereof; that they should draw their veils over their bosoms and not
display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’
fathers, their sons...."[Al-Qur’an 24:31]
The extent of hijaab
for a woman is that her complete body should be covered. The only part that can
be seen, are the face and the hands up to the wrists. If they wish to cover,
they can even cover these parts of the body. However some Islamic scholars
insist that even the face should be covered.
-
Hijaab
prevents molestation
The reason why
Allah has prescribed Hijaab for the women is given in the Qur’an in the
following verse of Surah Al-Ahzab:
"O Prophet! Tell thy wives
and daughters, and the believing women,that they should cast their outer
garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they
should be known (as such) and not molested. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, most
Merciful." [Al-Qur’an 33:59]
The Qur’an says that
Hijaab has been prescribed for the women so that they are recognized as
modest women this would prevent them from being molested.
-
Example of twin sisters
Suppose two
sisters who are twins and who are equally beautiful, walk down a street. One
of them is wearing the Islamic Hijaab i.e. the complete body is covered
except for the face and the hands up to the wrists, and the other twin is
wearing a mini skirt or shorts. Around the corner there is a hooligan who is
waiting for an opportunity to tease a girl. Who will he tease? The girl
wearing the Islamic Hijaab or the girl wearing the mini skirt or
shorts? Dresses that expose more than they conceal, are an indirect temptation
to the opposite sex for teasing, molestation and rape. The Qur’an rightly says
that the hijaab prevents women from being molested.
-
Capital punishment for
rapist
The Islamic
shariah prescribes capital punishment for a convicted rapist. The
non-Muslim may be horrified at such a stringent punishment in this age. Many
accuse Islam of being ruthless and barbaric. I have asked a common question to
hundreds of non-Muslim men. Suppose God-forbid, some one rapes your wife, your
mother or your sister and you are made the judge. The rapist is brought in
front of you. What punishment would you give him? All of them said, "we would
put him to death." Some went to the extent of saying, "we would torture him to
death", If your wife or your mother is raped you want the rapist to be put to
death. But if someone else’s wife or mother is raped, capital punishment is a
barbaric law. Why the double standards?
-
U.S.A. has one of the
highest rate of Rape
The United
States of America is supposed to be one of the most advanced countries of the
world. An F.B.I report in the year 1990 says that 1,02,555 cases of rape were
reported. It further says that only 16% of the cases of rapes are reported.
Thus, in order to know the actual number of rapes that took place in 1990, the
reported figure should be multiplied by 6.25. We get a total of 6,40,968 rape
cases that took place in the year 1990. If the total is divided by 365 the
number of days in a year, we get an average of 1,756 rape incidents everyday.
Later another report said
that an average of 1900 cases of rape are committed in U.S.A every day.
According to National Crime Victimization Survey Bureau of Justice Statistics
(U. S. Dept. of Justice) in 1996 alone 3,07,000 cases of rape were reported.
Only 31% of the actual cases of rape were reported. Thus, 3,07,000 X 3.226 =
9,90,322 rapes took place in 1996. That is, an average of 2,713 cases of rape
took place everyday in America
in 1996. Every 32 seconds one rape is taking place in America. Maybe American
rapists got bolder. The FBI report of 1990 continues and says that out of the
rape cases that were reported only 10% of the rapist were arrested, that is only
1.6% of the actual rapes committed. Out of those arrested, 50% were let free
before the trial. This would mean that only 0.8% of the rapists faced a trial.
In other words if a person commits 125 rapes the chances that he will get a
punishment for rape is only once. Many would consider this a good gamble. And
the report says that of those people who faced trial 50% received sentences of
less than a year’s imprisonment though the American law says rape carries a
seven year sentence of imprisonment. For a rapist, the judge is lenient to first
time offenders. Imagine a person commits 125 rapes and the chances of being
convicted is only once, and 50% of the time the judge will grant leniency and
give a sentence of less than a year!
-
Results achieved when
Islamic Shariah Implemented
Suppose the
Islamic shariah is implemented in America. Whenever a man looks at a
woman and if any brazen or unashamed thought comes to his mind, he lowers his
gaze. Every woman wears the Islamic Hijaab, that is the complete body
is covered except the face and the hands upto the wrists. After this if any
man commits rape, he gets capital punishment. The question is, will the rate
of rape in America increase, will it remain the same or will it decrease?
Naturally it will decrease. Islamic Shariah gets results.
4. Islam has Practical Solutions for the Problems of Mankind
Islam is the best way of
life because its teachings are not doctrinaire rhetoric but practical solutions
for the problems of mankind. Islam achieves results both at the individual and
collective levels. Islam is the best way of life because it is a practical,
universal religion not confined to any ethnic group or nationality.
HEREAFTER - LIFE AFTER DEATH
Question
How can you prove the
existence of hereafter, i.e. life after death?
Answer
1. Belief in the hereafter is not based on blind faith?
Many people wonder as to how
a person with a scientific and logical temperament, can lend any credence to the
belief of life after death. People assume that anyone believing in the hereafter
is doing so on the basis of blind belief.
My belief in the hereafter
is based on a logical argument.
2. Hereafter a logical belief
There are more than a
thousand verses in the Glorious Qur’an, containing scientific facts (refer my
book "Qur’an and Modern Science-Compatible or Incompatible?"). Many facts
mentioned in the Qur’an have been discovered in the last few centuries. But
science has not advanced to a level where it can confirm every statement of the
Qur’an.
Suppose 80% of all that is
mentioned in the Qur’an has been proved 100% correct. About the remaining 20%,
science makes no categorical statement, since it has not advanced to a level,
where it can either prove or disprove these statements. With the limited
knowledge that we have, we cannot say for sure whether even a single percentage
or a single verse of the Qur’an from this 20% portion is wrong. Thus when 80% of
the Qur’an is 100% correct and the remaining 20% is not disproved, logic says
that even the 20% portion is correct. The existence of the hereafter, which is
mentioned in the Qur’an, falls in the 20% ambiguous portion which my logic says
is correct.
3.
Concept of peace and human values is useless without the concept of hereafter
Is robbing a good or an evil
act? A normal balanced person would say it is evil. How would a person who does
not believe in the hereafter convince a powerful and influential criminal that
robbing is evil?
Suppose I am the most
powerful and influential criminal in the world. At the same time I am an
Intelligent and a logical person. I say that robbing is good because it helps me
lead a luxurious life. Thus robbing is good for me.
If anybody can put forward a
single logical argument as to why it is evil for me, I will stop immediately.
People usually put forward the following arguments:
a. The person who
is robbed will face difficulties
Some may say that the person
who is robbed will face difficulties. I certainly agree that it is bad for the
person who is robbed. But it is good for me. If I rob a thousand dollars, I can
enjoy a good meal at a 5 star restaurant.
b. Someone may rob
you
Some people argue that
someday I may be robbed. No one can rob me because I am a very powerful criminal
and I have hundreds of bodyguards. I can rob anybody but nobody can rob me.
Robbing may be a risky profession for a common man but not for an influential
person like me.
c. The police may
arrest you
Some may say, if you rob,
you can be arrested by the police. The police cannot arrest me because I have
the police on my payroll. I have the ministers on my payroll. I agree that if a
common man robs, he will be arrested and it will be bad for him, but I am an
extraordinarily influential and powerful criminal.
Give me one logical reason
why it is bad for me and I will stop robbing.
d. Its easy money
Some may say its easy money
and not hard-earned money. I agree completely that it is easy money, and that is
one of the main reasons why I rob. If a person has the option of earning money
the easy as well as the hard way, any logical person would choose the easy way.
e. It is against
humanity
Some may say it is against
humanity and that a person should care for other human beings. I counter argue
by asking as to who wrote this law called ‘humanity’ and why should I follow it?
This law may be good for the
emotional and sentimental people but I am a logical person and I see no benefit
in caring for other human beings.
f. It is a selfish
act
Some may say that robbing is
being selfish. It is true that robbing is a selfish act; but then why should I
not be selfish? It helps me enjoy life.
1. No logical reason
for robbing being an evil act
Hence all arguments that
attempt to prove that robbing is an evil act are futile. These arguments may
satisfy a common man but not a powerful and influential criminal like me. None
of the arguments can be defended on the strength of reason and logic. It is no
surprise that there are so many criminals in this world.
Similarly raping, cheating
etc. can be justified as good for a person like me and there is no logical
argument that can convince me that these things are bad.
2. A Muslim can
convince a powerful and influential criminal
Now let us switch sides.
Suppose you are the most powerful and influential criminal in the world, who has
the police and the ministers on his payroll. You have army of thugs to protect
you. I am a Muslim who will convince you that robbing, raping, cheating, etc.
are evil acts.
Even if I put forth the same
arguments to prove that robbing is evil the criminal will respond the same way
as he did earlier.
I agree that the criminal is
being logical and all his arguments are true only when he is the most powerful
and influential criminal.
3. Every human being
wants justice
Each and every human being
desires justice. Even if he does not want justice for others he wants justice
for himself. Some people are intoxicated by power and influence and inflict pain
and suffering on others. The same people, however, would surely object if some
injustice was done to them. The reason such people become insensitive to the
suffering of others is that they worship power and influence. Power and
influence, they feel, not only allows them to inflict injustice on others but
also prevents others from doing likewise to them.
4.
God is Most Powerful and Just
As a Muslim I would convince
the criminal about the existence of Almighty God (refer to answer proving the
existence of God). This God is more powerful than you and at the same time is
also just. The Glorious Qur’an says:
"Allah is never unjust
In the least degree"[Al-Qur’an 4:40]
5. Why does God not
punish me?
The criminal, being a
logical and scientific person, agrees that God exists, after being presented
with scientific facts from the Qur’an. He may argue as to why God, if He is
Powerful and Just, does not punish him.
6. The people who do
injustice should be punished
Every person who has
suffered injustice, irrespective of financial or social status, almost certainly
wants the perpetrator of injustice to be punished. Every normal person would
like the robber or the rapist to be taught a lesson. Though a large number of
criminals are punished, many even go scot-free. They lead a pleasant, luxurious
life, and even enjoy a peaceful existence. If injustice is done to a powerful
and influential person, by someone more powerful and more influential than he,
even such a person would want that person perpetrators of injustice to be
punished.
7. This life is a test
for the hereafter
This life is a test for the
hereafter. The Glorious Qur’an says:
"He who created DeathAnd life that HeMay try which of you
is best in deed;And He is the Exalted
In Might, Oft-Forgiving"[Al-Qur’an 67:2]
8. Final justice on day
of judgement
The Glorious Qur’an says:
"Every soul shall have
A taste of death: And only on the Day
Of Judgement shall you
Be paid your full recompense. Only he who is saved
Far from the Fire
And admitted to the Garden
Will have attained
The object (of life):For the life of this world
Is but goods and chattels
Of deception." [Al-Qur’an 3:185]
Final justice will be meted
out on the Day of Judgement. After a person dies, he will be resurrected on the
Day of Judgement along with the rest of mankind. It is possible that a person
receives part of his punishment in this world. The final reward and punishment
will only be in the hereafter. God Almighty may not punish a robber or a rapist
in this world but he will surely be held accountable on the Day of Judgement and
will be punished in the hereafter i.e. life after death.
9. What punishment can
the human law give Hitler?
Hitler incinerated six
million Jews during his reign of terror. Even if the police had arrested him,
what punishment can the human law give Hitler for justice to prevail? The most
they can do is to send Hitler to the gas chamber. But that will only be
punishment for the killing of one Jew. What about the remaining five million,
nine hundred and ninety nine thousand, nine hundred and ninety-nine Jews?
10. Allah can burn Hitler
more than six million times in hellfire
Allah say in the Glorious
Qur’an:
"Those who rejectOur signs, We shall soonCast into the Fire;As often as their skinsAre roasted through,
We shall change themFor fresh skins'
That they may taste
The penalty: for AllahIs Exalted in Power, Wise" [Al-Qur’an 4:56]
If Allah wishes he can
incinerate Hitler six million times in the hereafter in the hellfire.
11. No concept of human
values or good and bad without concept of hereafter
It is clear that without
convincing a person about the hereafter, i.e. life after death, the concept of
human values and the good or evil nature of acts is impossible to prove to any
person who is doing injustice especially when he is influential and powerful.
|